Bug #171
In alternate hierarchy template, let \sd have lx as a parent
| Status: | New | Start: | ||
| Priority: | High | Due date: | ||
| Assigned to: | Cambell Prince | % Done: | 0% |
|
| Category: | application | Spent time: | - | |
| Target version: | V0.11 | |||
| Resolution: |
Description
From some Grimes data:
\lx a'a \ph ˈʔaʔa *\sd kin* \pn kb \ps n \+sn
History
05/08/2010 10:36 PM - J C
Maybe this is a shorthand for saying "all of the senses of this word share this semantic domain", but is this really a standard? I thought the only difference with the alt hierarchy was the relative ordering of ps and sn. Since only senses can have semantics, shouldn't sd always be somewhere under sn in both the standard and alt hierarchies? (For that matter, I thought sd was usually a child of is, which was a child of sn.) -Jon
05/31/2010 05:09 PM - J C
See also:
http://projects.palaso.org/issues/show/427
http://projects.palaso.org/issues/show/170
Maybe we should document all suggested template changes under issue 427?